Britain’s first LGBT+ retirement village to open in Vauxhall at Norman Foster-designed Bankhouse
The scheme hopes to help older people who feel forced to go ‘back into the closet’ in conventional retirement homes.
Britain’s first retirement community for older LGBT+ people is to be created in Vauxhall.
Housing association Tonic said it would purchase 19 already built flats at the Lord Foster designed Bankhouse development next to the Thames using a £5.7 million loan from the Mayor.
The one and two bedroom apartments will be made available on a shared ownership basis from “late Spring” with residents moving in from mid-summer. The scheme will have a restaurant, a roof terrace and gardens.
The flats are not exclusively for LGBT+ people and straight couples who support the values of the gay community are also welcome to apply. However it is expected that the vast majority of the residents will be from an LGBT+ background.
Occupiers will be able to purchase shares of between 25 and 75 per cent and pay rent on the remaining portion.
They will be able to buy support and care packages depending on their needs.
Deputy Mayor for housing Tom Copley said the scheme was a significant milestone because so many older LGBT+ people have been forced to go “back into the closet” in conventional retirement homes.
He said: “Many older people have grown up when society was a lot less accepting and to someone moving into a new community and you are not sure how accepting people will be towards you that can be quite intimidating.”
Tonic Housing’s chief executive Anna Kear said: “We are making history today, realising a long-held dream to provide a safe place for older LGBT+ people to live well, in a community where they can be themselves and enjoy their later life. We applaud the Mayor of London for recognising and supporting the needs of older LGBT+ Londoners.”
Sir Derek George Jacobi CBE; born 22 October 1938 is an English actor and stage director.
A “forceful, commanding stage presence”, Jacobi has enjoyed a successful stage career, appearing in such stage productions as Hamlet, Uncle Vanya, and Oedipus the King.
“I knew I was gay very early on, although it wasn’t called gay back then. I knew that I wasn’t into girls in the way that I should be. I dated girls, and we sat in the back row of the cinema, and I did all that I was supposed to do, but I wasn’t enjoying it. I confessed to my mother while I was at university and she very typically and sweetly said: ‘All boys go through this stage.’
I was a loner for years, but I’ve been with my partner (Richard Clifford) for 43 years, which is quite an achievement. It remains a stable and loving relationship. It was another piece of luck in my life.”
Renee Richards’ journey from tennis outcast to trans pioneer
Renee Richards briefly broke into the top 20 of the women’s world rankings.
“I had death threats. I had people who hated me. People told me I was immoral.”
Transgender tennis player Renee Richards was already proving to be a divisive figure when the level of scrutiny surged.
Shortly before the 1977 US Open, the 42-year-old American won a legal battle to compete in the women’s events, leaving her at the centre of a polarising story which made headlines across the world.
“Everybody had a reaction. They were either for her or against her,” says Britain’s Sue Barker, who played against Richards twice in her career and remembers her being booed off court during one of the matches.
“I was a supporter of Renee, I was one of the few in a way.”
The dissent from the sport’s rule makers, which was backed by several leading players, centred on the belief the 6ft 1in Richards would dominate because of an unfair physical advantage over her rivals.
Others, even aside from those making the threats to her life, were less covert with their objections.
Wherever they were on the sliding scale of disapproval, their bottom line was Richards should not be allowed to play against the likes of Sue Barker, Chrissie Evert and Martina Navratilova.
Richards, who was born in 1934, excelled in a range of sports, got married and started a family.
After graduating from Yale University, the affluent New Yorker trained to be an ophthalmologist, going on to specialise in eye-muscle surgery.
Combining a medical profession with an amateur tennis career, Richards reached the second round of the US Open men’s singles in 1955 and 1957.
“I had a very good and a very full life as Richard. But I had this other side of me which kept emerging,” Richards told the BBC in 2015.
Shaving her legs and wearing skirts while dog-walking allowed her to do what felt natural. But being born a man and living as a woman was not widely accepted in 1960s America, stigmatised and classified as a mental illness.
“I kept pushing back until finally it was not possible to submerge Renee anymore – and Renee won out,” she said.
In 1975, aged 40, she had gender reassignment surgery.
Initially, her plan was to move to California and start afresh in a place where nobody knew her.
But her previous identity was unveiled when she started playing amateur tennis tournaments, leading to a newspaper exposé, more headlines and an insistence from United States Tennis Association (USTA) officials that she could not compete in women’s tournaments.
“I never planned to play professionally as a woman. But when they said ‘you’re not going to be allowed to play’ that changed everything,” said Richards, who is now 86 and living out of the public eye in upstate New York.
“I told them ‘you can’t tell me what I can and can’t do’. I was a women and if I wanted to play in the US Open as a woman – I was going to do it.”
To armour their blockade of Richards, the USTA introduced a chromosome test for the women’s players before the 1976 US Open. Richards failed the tests and was barred from entering.
That led her down the legal route and culminated in a year long battle for the right to play. The odds were stacked against Richards.
“The USTA had the top lawyers in New York, they brought in witness after witness saying I should not be allowed to play,” she said.
“My lawyer Michael Rosen only had one witness for me.”
That witness proved pivotal. Billie Jean King, who had played doubles with Richards, was a powerful voice after her tireless campaigning for gender and sexual equality.
In an affidavit submitted to the New York State Supreme Court, 12-time individual Grand Slam champion King insisted Richards did “not enjoy physical superiority or strength so as to have an advantage over women competitors in the sport of tennis”.
The judge agreed. Eight days later, Richards was playing in the 1977 US Open.
‘People wondered if it would be a gamechanger’
Tennis had never seen anything like it. Not only did the women’s players now have to take chromosome tests, their preparations for the Grand Slam were disrupted by constant questioning about Richards’ participation in a fervent media storm.
The sport was broadly split into two camps: rejection and a fear she would dominate the game, or acceptance and a show of empathy.
“I was open minded,” said Barker, who used to hit with Richards on the practice courts, “but the ruling frightened a lot of people. They feared she would serve-volley the rest of us off the court and wondered if it would be a gamechanger for the sport.”
Reigning Wimbledon champion Virginia Wade played Richards in the first round but was untroubled in a straightforward victory.
Richards did reach the women’s doubles final alongside Betty Ann Stuart, although they were beaten by top seeds Navratilova and Betty Stove.
Richards’ best finish in women’s Grand Slam singles events was reaching the third round at the 1979 US Open.
Frostiness in the locker room thawed when it became apparent Richards would not offer too much threat. Or, as Richards put it, that she would not “take their money away”.
While she beat some notable names, and climbed into the world’s top 20, Richards lacked the athleticism and mobility of her younger rivals to topple Evert and Navratilova at the summit.
Richards retired aged 47 in 1981 and went on to coach Navratilova to three Grand Slam singles titles.
“It didn’t become the story which a lot of people thought it might become,” says Barker. “She just melted into the tour and didn’t dominate. She won matches and she lost matches. It didn’t alter the game as some predicted. But she achieved what she wanted to do, to play professionally as a woman and was welcomed by the vast majority.”
‘Confrontational’ crowd forced Richards off court and into tears
Hostility and suspicion eventually faded in the locker room, but Richards still faced obstruction and abuse.
She was barred from competing in many tournaments, including Wimbledon and the French Open, where rulebooks said only players whose biological sex was female could play in the women’s events.
This meant most of her appearances came in the United States, travelling around new cities and being made to feel like a circus act as she played in front of a new crowd.
Barker remembers playing Richards in the American’s early days on the women’s tour and says the atmosphere was “confrontational”.
“There were probably about 7,000 people there in this huge arena and she was not well-received by most, if not all, of the crowd,” says Barker. “It was just horrible. They were shouting things, booing every time she hit the ball and cheering every mistake.”
Despite Barker and the umpire trying to simmer the crowd, tournament officials eventually decided to take them off the court.
The pair were beckoned to a room underneath the stand. Richards started to cry.
“It was really sad and I felt so sorry for her. I told her she didn’t have to put herself through it,” remembers Barker. “Eventually we went back out but it was clear she wasn’t thinking about the tennis. I think she wanted to just get off the court. All she wanted to do was to play tennis.”
Occasionally Richards used to open up to her colleagues, many of whom were curious about her life.
There was a feeling the scrutiny – with Richards later saying she couldn’t “go anywhere in the world without being recognised” – caught her by surprise and took its toll.
“We all admired her courage after the emotional and difficult journey she had been through,” says Barker.
“She used to talk about the emotions she went through and often asked whether she was doing the right thing. I’m not sure she realised the impact it was going to have. I can’t think of another athlete who has had anywhere near that level of attention. It was an incredibly brave thing to do.”
After retiring in 1981, Richards started coaching Martina Navratilova and helped her win several Grand Slam titles.